Bitcoin Must Be Accepted by World Bank, According to Charter | MicroStrategy Acquires Additional Bitcoins and Now Holds Over 105,000 BTC in Total

Top stories and news you should know in the bitcoin, crypto, and decentralized markets

Quote of the Week

“Sold almost all of my bitcoin. Don’t need it… I’m saying that this is not going up because of structural reasons.”

— Jim Cramer (CNBC contributor, Mad Money host, on June 21st with BTC trading at ~$32K its local bottom)

High Level

  • SHOT: The World Bank refuses to help El Salvador with their acceptance and implementation of their Bitcoin Bill making BTC legal tender alongside the world’s reserve currency USD, but it turns out that it must accept legal tender from member countries as part of their own charter.

  • CHASER: Meaning the World Bank MUST accept BTC as well as pay El Salvador the offset of the gains and/or take delivery of their legal tender (bitcoin) for any losses forcing them to implement the capabilities to both accept and pay nations in bitcoin.

The World Bank’s Bitcoin Backfire

WELL, Well, well…

The World Bank in short time after mockingly refusing to help El Salvador with its Bitcoin acceptance and implementation found that there was catch in their own charter from 1944 requiring them to accept the legal tenders of member countries, meaning it must accept bitcoin according to their own sanctions.

After trying to pour cold water on El Salvador’s adoption of bitcoin as legal tender due to “environmental and transparency” concerns, the World Bank discovered in its founding document some articles that may soon force them to accept bitcoin payments from countries that have embraced bitcoin and crypto assets. The central theme of 1944 Articles of Agreement for the World Bank is commitment to accept payments from member states in local currencies to engage with sovereign governments “to end extreme poverty and promote shared prosperity.” The charter allows payments in “the member’s currency,” but it also allows central banks to pay with “notes or similar obligations” backed by their reserves.

Section 12 of Article V defines acceptable “forms of holdings of currency” as follows:

  • The Bank shall accept from any member, in place of any part of the member’s currency, paid in to the Bank under Article II, Section 7 (i), or to meet amortization payments on loans made with such currency, and not needed by the Bank in its operations, notes or similar obligations issued by the Government of the member or the depository designated by such member, which shall be non-negotiable, non-interest bearing and payable at their par value on demand by credit to the account of the Bank in the designated depository.

If that was not already great news, it gets better. In the case of El Salvador’s development bank, Banco de Desarrollo, their $150M bitcoin fund can act as reserves to back their IOUs. Additionally the World Bank’s charter says if the local currency has appreciated in value, then the World Bank must pay those gains back.

Section 9 of Article II states that holdings paid into the bank by members should be continually revalued (presumably against a “real” benchmark like USD), so if the local currency has appreciated, it says, the World Bank should do the decent thing and hands the gains back:

  • Whenever the par value of a member’s currency is increased, the Bank shall return to such member within a reasonable time an amount of that member’s currency equal to the increase in the value of the amount of such currency.

This creates an interesting scenario for the World Bank because they may be asked to pay El Salvador in bitcoin. On the contrary, should the local currency depreciate in value and the member gets margin called it has to “pay to the Bank within a reasonable amount of time an additional amount of its own currency sufficient to maintain the value.” Making matters even more bizarre, if El Salvador’s bitcoin falls in value, the World Bank actually will have to accept bitcoin as payment and begin stacking their own position in the asset.

It is not written in stone, so these articles may change. The World Bank very well could also choose not to respect the sovereign right of El Salvador to choose its own currency. The former would not be surprising, but the latter could be telling of the scheme that the World Bank pulls with central banks to financially engineer exploitative deals with member countries.

After rejecting any association with their use of bitcoin as legal tender, bitcoin-ers dug deep to show the World Bank that its hands were tied by their own charter that forces them to implement the capability to both accept as well as pay member countries in bitcoin.

TL;DR — The World Bank disparaged bitcoin and El Salvador without knowing that their own founding document requires them to not only help them with their new legal tender (BTC), but also requires themselves to implement it into their own payment systems.

Read More Here

News You Should Know

MicroStrategy Acquires Additional Bitcoins and Now Holds Over 105,000 Bitcoins in Total

MicroStrategy® Incorporated (Nasdaq: MSTR), the largest independent publicly-traded business intelligence company, announced that it had purchased an additional approximately 13,005 bitcoins for approximately $489 million in cash at an average price of approximately $37,617 per bitcoin, inclusive of fees and expenses. MicroStrategy holds an aggregate of approximately 105,085 bitcoins, which were acquired at an aggregate purchase price of approximately $2.741 billion and an average purchase price of approximately $26,080 per bitcoin, inclusive of fees and expenses. MacroStrategy LLC, a subsidiary of MicroStrategy, holds approximately 92,079 of the bitcoins.

Read More Here

Citigroup Launches a Digital Asset Unit within Its Wealth Management Division

The latest bank to join the cadre of those considering offering crypto products for their wealthy clients as well as futures, trading, and custody services for them too. It is a no brainer for these banks to do so because they risk continuing to drag their feet while missing out on potential revenue streams.

Read More Here

Cramer Says He ‘Sold Almost All’ of His Bitcoin, Fearing China Has Had It with Crypto

The reason why this was a naïve decision for Cramer is that China’s crackdown on the mining and trading of bitcoin shows its powers as a tool for capitalism and democracy at a time when their government is clamping down hard in Hong Kong. Buying bitcoin rather than selling would have been the more patriotic as well as profitable move. Right now we are witnessing one of the greatest transfers of resources and wealth of the century from East to West, and it’s one massive opportunity… See the additional reading section at the bottom for an article on this topic!

Read More Here

Pictures Say 1,000 Words, Memes Say 10,000

Positive Vibes Only

Thought Provoking Tweets

Tweets Moving the Markets

Other Investment News

Additional Reading

  1. The Merit and Nature of Bitcoin’s Energy Consumption by Nic Carter & Castle Island Ventures

  2. Go West, Bitcoin! Unpacking the Great Hashrate Migration by Nic Carter

Thanks for Reading!

You can find more content like this on our website here and subscribe to receive more of these newsletters and stories here

Share systemic bliss® newsletter

An investment in any asset or strategy involves a high degree of risk and there is always the possibility of loss, including the loss of principal. Nothing written above may be considered as an offer or solicitation to purchase or sell securities or other services. The trading and investing ideas and strategies discussed above are not recommendations to buy or sell any security and are not intended to provide any investment advice and/or recommendations of any kind, but are made available solely for educational and informational purposes. Before acting on information from above, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and strongly consider seeking advice from your own financial or investment adviser. Data sources are from publicly available outlets and news. Figures may have changed or incorrect, please do your own research.